Indian views on the destiny that the soul has are entwined with equally significant views of the nature of the soul. I won't attempt to determine the meaning of the word "soul" in European philosophy , but in the context of popular religion, it surely refers to that which remains after an individual body is arbitrarily separated from the human persona without asking what proportion of the personality can be considered to exist without a tangible substratum.
The popular soul comprises the mind, perception and desire and, often, no effort is made to differentiate it from other souls. However, the case is different in India. It is said that the soul (atman and purusha) makes use of the senses and the mind.
They function as instruments rather than components of it. For instance, sight is the main source of spectacles for the soul. The other senses, and even your mental faculties (manas), which functions as an organ of the intellect are also instruments. You can also learn more about orientation to hindu studies via online.
If we think about a soul that passes through death and rebirth and this, according to the majority of Hindus, can be described as a spirit that is accompanied by its baggage of thoughts and senses. It is a very subtle body, however nevertheless gaseous and not spiritual.
In the study of oriental religions, sympathy and a desire for agreement when possible are the most important requirements. The best way to approach this is to determine what many of our smartest brothers are referring to in the absence of brain activity and the reasons why they consider it an ideal.